We’ve seen some nasty accidents in races in the previous few seasons – essentially the most infamous was the one at Itzulia Basque Nation that introduced down Jonas Vingegaard, Primož Roglič, and Remco Evenepoel amongst others. The lengthy shadow it threw over the season means it was at the very least as consequential to the yr as, say, the collected efforts of Crew Ineos.
Michael Hutchinson
A number of nationwide champion on the bike and award-winning creator Michael Hutchinson writes for CW each week
The way you make the game safer is a crucial query, with no straightforward solutions. On the current race organisers’ convention, Tour de France director Christian Prudhomme drew on years of expertise to inform the room, “The races have to decelerate. The riders are going too quick.”
He’s probably not fallacious, per se. However, “the riders are going too quick” is like standing by the roadside flapping your arms and shouting, “Cautious!” I do know that doesn’t work as a result of these had been the precise phrases I heard just a few years again instantly earlier than going headfirst over a wall right into a area of sheep. Coming from somebody like Prudhomme, whose total enterprise mannequin exists solely to incentivise bike riders to go as quick as attainable, it’s extra like irony than evaluation.
However, to take it at face worth for a second, might we sluggish all of it down? Limiting the scale of gears has been a proposal, which might cease riders pedalling on descents. Right here’s the issue, although. If you happen to’re belting down a ten% hill, pedalling at 300 watts in one thing like 58 x 11 and doing 85kph, you’re clearly at some threat. If you happen to needed to freewheel as a substitute, you’d nonetheless be doing 80kph. Besides that for those who don’t should pedal you possibly can undertake a extra aero place and do most of 85kph anyway.
There have been different concepts. We might use the regs to unwind some know-how advances. If we mandated flapping jerseys, box-section wheels, helmets with vents sufficiently big to suck in complete birds and frames made out of huge spherical tubes, it could set aerodynamics again 30 years and sluggish racing at a stroke.
Right here the issue is worse than physics. It’s optics. Would anybody wish to watch a race the place all of the riders have arrived contemporary from 1985? Do you wish to see professionals racing bikes that aren’t nearly as good as these in your membership’s over-60s cafe journey?
We might attempt a turbo-trainer model electromagnetic brake within the rear hub to simply sluggish all the pieces down, however then Tadej Pogačar would possible set fireplace to his personal arse.
The newest race content material, interviews, options, opinions and skilled shopping for guides, direct to your inbox!
What would possibly work? Truthfully, I’ve nothing useful to supply. It’s a sport that’s all about going quick and I’ve no thought the way you flip that spherical. The very best I’ve give you is neutralising descents, however whereas nobody needs to observe a crash, everybody needs to observe Tom Pidcock slicing down an Alp. My over-60s WorldTour doesn’t work both, as a result of if something, previous bike riders are even larger maniacs than younger ones they usually’re as topic to gravity as the following rider.
The reality is that safer racing in all probability requires a number of issues. Cautious course design, perhaps utilizing extra multi-lap programs in order that riders have fewer surprises to take care of. Extra scrutiny of highway surfaces within the design course of. And whereas getting riders to decelerate may be very laborious, getting them to journey extra safely may be simpler, however wants clever commissairing.
The one factor I do know is that telling riders they’re going too quick will solely encourage them to go sooner. They’re racing cyclists. They’re like that.
This text was initially printed in Biking Weekly journal. Subscribe now and by no means miss a difficulty.